Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Holmgren to Start Frye in Cleveland

In an effort to jump start his sluggish offense, and send a message to both his recently inconsistent multi-million dollar signal caller, and the opposing sideline, Mike Holmgren is due to announce a new starting QB in this Sunday's contest against the Browns.

Charlie Frye is due to get the start in stadium where he was the opening day starter for Cleveland before being unceremoniously dumped after a pitiful loss to the visiting Steelers. Shortly thereafter, he was picked up by the Seahawks, who were looking for a viable 3rd string quarterback that would allow the multi-talented Seneca Wallace to get more involved in the offensive gameplan.

Now that plan has come full circle.

"Matt's a little dinged up, and frankly, can use a game to sit and watch and hopefully get his timing and rhythm back" said Holmgren after the second day of practice in which the perennial starter Hasselbeck didn't take a single snap. "We know Charlie can play. They know Charlie can play. We want to show them just how big a mistake they made in releasing him."

Wallace will be listed as the backup quarterback, allowing him to see time on the field at various positions, meaning Hasselbeck will be listed as inactive for the first time since coming to Seattle. "Sure it hurts" said the consummate professional, "but while all the fans have been booing Shaun, I know that my miscues and overthrows have derailed this team as much as our ineffective running game, so it is what it is." Besides, anyone who follows football knew that my days as a starter were numbered the day they signed Frye.

Reminded that the Browns and the Seahawks share similar 4-3 records, and the importance of this game to starting the stretch run to the play-offs, Holmgren was grilled by the local Seattle media about making such a risky change at a high profile position at this point in the season. "You should have known things were different when I started calling flea-flickers and WR option passes", explained the suddenly unpredictable coach, "That's just how I roll!"

So while the Seattle faithful will be holding their collective breath on Sunday, it remains to be seen whether it will be Browns fans or Seahawks fans who will exclaim "Thank God It's Frye-day" at the end of the game.


  1. Does it matter who is playing QB against the Browns? Didn't Bulger just throw for three hundred against them with no ribs?

    Mike K.

  2. Yea, and the winless Dolphins put up 31 points on them too!

    However, weren't the Saints supposed to crap the bed when they experienced the shock and awe of the Seahawks in Qwest field??!!

    This game scares me.

  3. I'm due to kick douche's ass.

  4. That would be a change from the circle jerk that you have going on over here, huh?

  5. For some reason, this YouTube clip seems relevent.


    Come on Charlie...unleash some throwgasms on your old team!

  6. This game scares me too, simply because the Browns are a historically bad team, and the 2007 Hawks are seemingly overlooking historically bad teams.

  7. Any chance of me scaring up some e-fighting with 222? Rowr! Or should we just skip to the part where you offer to send me a plane ticket to your local airport for an ass whoopin? Either way is cool with me.

  8. I can't even afford a plane ticket for myself right now and even if I could I wouldn't waste the money flying across the country on the false premise of kicking somebody's ass! What a stupid fucking thing to say!

    Get your own plane ticket here if you want to be that big of a dipshit and I'll gladly accommodate you with my presence, but why do you want to fight me anyway? Because I think that Alba's writing sucks ass? That's THE stupidest thing that I've read since Albany's last article!

  9. For a guy who says he hates this site, you sure seem to be spending a lot of time here reading the articles and shit!

    Don't go away mad, Dueces, just go away!

  10. I'm not mad! :-) I came here to rattle your cage a little bit! I obviously can't speak as freely at the BLUE, so I came over here to express my feelings.

    You can take it personally if you want, but I've never really dug your writing. You write, so you have critiques. Your style isn't for everyone and I'm one of those.

    Hate that if you must, or have tough guy Josch(which I think is funny because josch is Navaho for pussy!) talk about flying here to fight me, but my opinion is just that and we all know about opinions, no?

  11. It's almost like anti-e-thugging. I'm gonna call it E-thuggin' to the extreme!

    You can say anything you want here, as far as I'm concerned. My comments were sarcasm, most of them are. But this isn't, you are a douchebag, Shitcube. Would you say you are an expert in Navaho?

  12. Not a Navaho expert by any means, but I worked with enough of them in Flagstaff to pick up the profane lingo.

    PS- Fuck you! You fucking cock jockey!

    Calling me a douchebag? You're such a worthless fecal pile that dung beetles wouldn't give you the time of day.

    Now stand back so I cam e-slap you in your cum-catching mouth again!

    Now if you all want to see the definition of irresponsible journalism, then go take a look at Albas new mixed up info, lack of fact and pure speculation frontpage piece of shit that is disgracing the SeahawkBlue frontpage.